Re: font error on a pdf



yeah, something with dbus, no debugging symbols, but you can see

 run
Starting program: /usr/bin/evince
Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...(no
debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded system supplied DSO at 0xffffe000
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
warning: the debug information found in
"/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.1.0.0.debug" does not match
"/usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.1" (CRC mismatch).

(no debugging symbols found)
warning: the debug information found in
"/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.1.0.0.debug" does not match
"/usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.1" (CRC mismatch).

(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)


On 3/10/06, John H. <mistamaila gmail com> wrote:
> i just tried the same thing on the .tar.bz2 source file, and i get this
>
> The Application "evince" has quit unexpectedly.
>
> You can inform the developers of what happened to help them fix it.
> Or you can restart the application right now.
>
> On 3/10/06, John H. <mistamaila gmail com> wrote:
> > hmm, recompile evince-5.1. .src.rpm ignoring the dbus requirement of
> > .60 since i only have .50, and it compiled/installed, but crashes on
> > run.  is .60 of dbus completely required?
> >
> > On 3/9/06, Nickolay V. Shmyrev <nshmyrev yandex ru> wrote:
> > > В Срд, 08/03/2006 в 22:09 -0600, John H. пишет:
> > > > i am just confused why it works on one machine and not the other.
> > > > do you mean next evince?  .5.1 is out, i noticed, does that fix?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it should work
> > >
> > >
> >
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]