Re: gecko vs. gtkhtml
- From: Alexander Nagel <feuerschwanz76 web de>
- To: Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gecko vs. gtkhtml
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100
Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2005, 18:03 -0500 schrieb Adam Hooper:
> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:40 +0100, Alexander Nagel wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > i don't want to mess anybody up but i'm just curious why epiphany uses gecko and not gtkhtml?
> > Is gtkhtml so bad for a browser?
>
> In short... yes. Unfathomably horrible. It just doesn't have what it
> takes; it's written do display emails.
>
> It wouldn't be difficult to plug in a gtkhtml renderer instead of gecko.
> There was one for Galeon a long time ago, before the fork. But it
> renders badly.
>
Thanks for your answer.
Alex
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]