Re: [Epiphany] questions/feature requests

[Marco Pesenti Gritti <marco gnome org>]

On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 14:16, Billy Hager wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:40:25PM -0400, David Adam Bordoley wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > 
> > way to pass the buck marco :P 
> > 
> > Well my opinion at the time and still is that for 90% of users save this 
> > page means save the whole thing. 
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > So if the page is only html we only save 
> > the html to a file and do not create a dir of images. If the page contains 
> > both html and images we save both. Users who want just the html can delete 
> > the folder of images. 
> 
> Interesting idea.
> 
> The problem(for me at least) is that the save operation not only saves the html
> and the images/etc, but the save operation also changes the links in the html
> so they point to the directory with the saved images/etc.
> 
> Doing "Save as" and then deleting the subsequently created content 
> directory doesn't accomplish what I'm looking for because the image links 
> have been changed.

Can you explain for what reason are you saving files ... to understand
better the context.

> > Also you can always view -> source and save to save 
> > only html. 
> 
> Okay, this sounds like a good option.
> 
> Unfortunately, when I do "view -> source" and then "file -> save as", the html
> source encapsulated into html before it is saved.  I end up with an html
> document of my html.  bug?

Yeah it's bug I think. Though maybe instead to fix it we should
investigate the possibility to open source in a text editor. This is
somethink we should try for 1.2 I think.

Marco