Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

[Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>]

On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 20:48 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:

> Ok, I am confused then... If GTK# is already modular as you claim and if 
> Mike is willing to offer a migration path for his current apps, I don't see 
> why all this discussion is taking place... There should not be any technical 
> reason left as to why GTK# shouldn't be in the bindings release.

Because it's only half true.  Three of the desktop libs (vte, rsvg, and
gtkhtml) are optional and built into their own assemblies.  The other
three (print/printui/panelapplet) are built into gnome-sharp.dll along
with the rest of the bound Gnome namespace.

-- 
Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>