Re: Time to heat up the new module discussion




I think using "Star-Bellied Sneetches" and "Plain-bellied Sneetches" would work well, if you're in to the whole brevity thing.

-Alex

Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 10:33 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 23:33 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
Anti-Mono folks generally [...] think
that high level languages should only be used for
prototyping (the benefits of RAD don't outweigh the
cons).
Some people have said this, but I don't think all people uncomfortable
with mono would agree.

I should have replaced every occurrence of "Pro-Mono folks" with

 "some people whom at some time in April, May or June argued for
including Mono in GNOME in some way"

and "Anti-Mono folks" with

 "some people whom at some point in April, May or June argued against
including Mono in GNOME in someway"

... but then it would have been impossible to read.

I would like to remind them that
gnome-games, long included by default on every Linux distribution,
depends on Scheme (the guile bindings).
AFAIU it only depends on guile, not the guile bindings to the gnome
stack.

Yes, you are correct.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]