Re: UI Review
- From: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: UI Review
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:36:14 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Ross Burton wrote:
> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:28:33 +0000
> From: Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>
> To: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
> Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
> Subject: Re: UI Review
>
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 15:17 +0000, Calum Benson wrote:
> > I'll probably regret asking this, but since we didn't do one for 2.12,
> > does anyone think it would be worthwhile doing one for 2.14? Or is the
> > HIG so ingrained in everyone's minds now that we don't need to
> > bother? :)
>
> I'd appreciate raving hordes of UI-zealots attacking Sound Juicer with
> its new (well, from 2.12) playback mode, if only so that I can ignore
> most of the feedback.
Sound Juicer was a great ripper.
Sound Juicer was not a music player.
Now Sound Juicer is a ripper which can also preview/playback the tracks.
You claims about using Sound Juicer as a music player is where much of
the criticism came from.
Sound Juicer can be used as a music player if you really want but it is
not as well suited for that task.
The criticism was hardly an attack by raving hordes.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]