Re: UI Review

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:41:16PM +0000, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 08:56 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Just wanted to say, Calum (and perhaps others listening in) that I
> > firmly believe that, done right, the UI reviews can be very, very
> > useful. It is clear that we're not doing it very well, though- perhaps
> > it needs to be more proactive, and earlier in the cycle?

If we're going with the new Clearlooks, does that need any sort of
UI or a11y review? I know that there have been sweeping changes.
There is a lot more blue.

Looking at what appears to be the default new-Clearlooks: there are
some highly visual changes that perhaps we should reconsider (I feel
that sweeping change from release to a release is a bad thing). I
have not talked to any of the Clearlooks guys yet, but was it
planned to make the theme looks more like it did last release (with
nice gradients) or to keep it the way it is?


Davyd Madeley
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118  C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]