Re: [gpm] Re: Gnome 2.16 Module Proposal: GNOME Power Manager
- From: Soeren Sonnenburg <desktop-devel-ml nn7 de>
- To: richard hughsie com
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gpm] Re: Gnome 2.16 Module Proposal: GNOME Power Manager
- Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:00:40 +0200
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 20:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 20:52 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:56:50 +0000, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 14:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 21:29 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > >> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> > I would like to see g-p-m fragmented into three parts.
> > >> >
> > >> > * A daemon with no GTK+ dependance that would be suitable for
> > >> > cross-desktop use
[...]
> > >> Umm, no.
> > [...]
> > > So in my opinion it's not that difficult, or am I missing something?
> >
> > Well and there is something like this already in pbbuttons
[...]
> You can continue to use pbbuttonsd if you like it. We can discuss
> pbbuttonsd if it is proposed for inclusion.
This is supposed to say it is nicely doable *if* necessary. I don't know
whether doing it at this stage for g-p-m is necessary or not. But on the
long run it is definitely beneficial to have a single daemon for all
freedesktop's.
Soeren.
PS: FWIW, I would probably switch to g-p-m and add OSD support if I feel
I like it.
--
Sometimes, there's a moment as you're waking, when you become aware of
the real world around you, but you're still dreaming.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]