Re: String review
- From: Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com>
- To: Christian Persch <chpe gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: String review
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:58:02 -0400
On 09/21/2005 02:49 PM, Christian Persch wrote:
Hi,
For quite some time, the general inconsistency of strings in the various
GNOME modules has irritated me. For example, let's just look at some
strings in GNOME:
bug-buddy:
"There already exists a file name '%s'.\n\nDo you wish to overwrite
this file?"
eog 1:
"Overwrite file %s?"
eog 2:
"A file named '%s' already exists."
epiphany:
"A file %s already exists."
evo 1:
"%s already exists\nDo you want to overwrite it?"
evo 2:
"A file by that name already exists.\nOverwrite it?"
galeon:
"The file %s already exists.\nDo you want to replace it?"
gedit 1:
"A file named \"%s\" already exists.\n"
gedit 2:
"The file \"%s\" already exists"
gnome-screenshot:
"The file \"%s\" already exists. Would you like to replace it?"
gseachtool:
"The document \"%s\" already exists. Would you like to replace it?"
gnumeric:
"A file called <i>%s</i> already exists in %s.\n\nDo you want to save
over it?"
nautilus-cd-burner:
"A file named \"%s\" already exists. Do you want to overwrite it?"
totem:
"A file named '%s' already exists. Are you sure you want to overwrite
it?"
Going forward, we can fix this specific case by using
gtk_file_chooser_set_do_overwrite_confirmation () which is new in GTK+ 2.8.
But, yeah, there are other instances of different strings. I'll go make
popcorn, this could be an interesting thread.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]