Re: High Contrast Icons
- From: Eric Larson <elarson novell com>
- To: Rodney Dawes <dobey novell com>
- Cc: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>, elarson hula ximian com, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: High Contrast Icons
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:59:25 -0500
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 20:47 -0500, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:42 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 22:40 +0000, Thomas Wood wrote:
> >
> > > If an application calls itself "accessible", having high contrast icons
> > > should be one of the requirements. Applications are allowed to install
> > > icons into the hicolor theme; if we're really taking accessibility
> > > seriously, then high contrast themes should have a similar status to
> > > hicolor.
> >
> > How do we keep applications from overwriting each other's icons?
>
> Don't name your application the same as another application, and
> namespace your icons appropriately? :) There is not really any good
> answer to this I guess. ...
It seems odd to me that we depend on a file name or specific URI to use
an icon. It seems that there is no reason for an icon to get a unique
key that the applications uses. Databases have done this for ages so I
don't see why there wouldn't be a file dispatcher or interface for
applications to register icons with in order to get a unique key.
Has this been discussed before? It seems that adding abstraction allows
for more flexibility and for better integration across desktops.
Eric
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]