Re: Certification for GNOME apps

[Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>]

On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 21:04, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> The first two seem like no-brainers, but what are you thinking of
> 'harming the name of GNOME'?  Is a clause requiring acceptable levels of
> privacy sufficient?  Do you have other, concrete concerns here?

I guess the extreme example might be "What do you do if someone comes to
you with a HIG compliant, gtk+ using, accessible, i18n translated 'Bomb
the New York Subway' game" [hello MI5]

There are things you want a reason never to be associated with.