Re: Another way to solve the Spatial vs. Navigational debate

[Tomasz Janowitz <logan77 o2 pl>]

Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 12/21/05, Jan de Groot <jan jgc homeip net> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:27 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/21/05, Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it> wrote:
>>>
>>>>See the attachment :-)
>>>
>>>Sweet, let's also have them pick the amount of edge resistance, focus
>>>policy, raising policy, the double-click-on-titlebar-action, whether
>>>they want animations, whether the taskbar lists windows from all
>>>desktops or just the current one, whether the taskbar should group
>>>windows, whether windows clicked on in the taskbar should restore to
>>>the current workspace or the native workspace, the application font,
>>>the desktop font, the window title font, the terminal font, the theme,
>>>the screensaver, and many, many more.
>>>
>>>That way we can make sure users get the optimal experience by having
>>>everything configured just the way they want it.
>>>
>>>:-)
>>
>>What about something like the personalization wizard that KDE uses? As
>>experienced user, I just click skip because I don't want to use KDE,
>>only want to test it to see if I didn't break something upgrading
>>packages in the distribution. Back those days when GNOME had a 1 as
>>first number in the version, I used KDE and the personalization wizard
>>was really nice to use the first time starting KDE.
> 
> 
> Hmm...looks like I should have added the "</sarcasm>" tag after all.  Oh, well.
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> 
> 
Well i hope it's a damn joke! Most people are not conscious of the fact,
that the way of dealing with directories 'explorer way' is the browser
mode. Most people that want to use spatial mode know anyway how to enable
it. And more stupid configuration of that sort is certainly not welcome
(not speaking about KDE here).