Re: EOG features

[Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>]

Scott J. Harmon wrote:
> A question I have, is how does EOG relate to gthumb?  (i.e. why should I 
> have both? If I should, when should I use EOG instead of gthumb?) It 
> seems that gthumb does all that EOG does and allows simple editing.
It also doesn't handle the factor of simplicity very well. When I 
double-click on a photo, I want to see the photo. Not thumbnails, a 
directory browser, two rows of toolbars, packed menus, etc.
EoG is more of Windows Image Viewer or MacOS Preview.app than Picassa or 
f-spot.
--Pat