Re: The Great Theme Debate

[Santhosh Hiriyur Shankar <sshankar novell com>]

Yes, maintainer taking the decision would be more feasible than having
this debate reopen.
Santhosh
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 12:20 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> tis 2004-11-09 klockan 14:39 +0800 skrev Davyd Madeley:
> > In case you've been living under a rock here is some background:
> > 
> > http://lists.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-June/msg00033.html
> > http://lists.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-July/msg00092.html
> > http://lists.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-August/msg00209.html
> > 
> > I propose we reopen the Great Theme Debate on our way to "G10". I would
> > really love to see the default GNOME install look really damned good out
> > of the box, so we can stick it to any smarmy BSD-using who think GNOME
> > is just too damned ugly.
> 
> I'm not sure that reopening this debate would be very productive. Let's
> face it, the list is never going to come to a consensus about this. I
> think the best solution is that the maintainer of libgnome* or some
> other module that fits better just make the decission and then do the
> change.
> 
> Best Regards,
>   Mikael Hallendal
> 
> > Let the gratuitous bickering begin! 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list