Re: Copyright assignment
- From: Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- Cc: Nat Friedman <nat novell com>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, Rob Adams <readams readams net>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Copyright assignment
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:55:36 +0100 (BST)
--- Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > In general, having say sign five legal letters to be able to hack on all parts
> of
> > desktop would be rather limiting. So really, it would be nice if the general
> policy
> > was that such assignment requirements are and contiunue to be very much
> > unacceptable. Foundation getting its act together and offering a way to assign
> > copyrights to itself would also help to remove problems with the single
> assignment
> > related concern GNOME should be concewrned about, that is licencing integrity.
> >
> > Having a futuire written policy of "there is no copyright assignment needed or
> such
> > will be assigned to the foundation" would be good.
>
> Various companies that fund work might have different reasons to keep
> copyright ownership over their code. OpenOffice will likely continue
> to require copyright assignment, so will Evolution, so will Real and as
> a strategy to get folks to open source their technologies, I will
> personally continue to encourage companies to open source software and
> ask for copyright assignment as a way of keeping a bit of a leverage.
>
> Not the ideal situation, but in the past it has opened the doors for
> more free software to be available.
>
> Is it a problem to sign five pieces of paper to get your code
> contributed? Very likely, but how many people are practically involved
> in all of these projects in a day-to-day basis?
>
In general - sure, having N number of copyright assignments is not a problem. The
situation would change if somebody proposed four additional desktop components that
required copyright assignment. That would suck. Tracking down whetver somebody has a
copyright assignemnt signed before you can commit their patch is a real PITA for
both sides and doesn't really help (yes, i've done that a lot).
> I do not believe it is as problematic as people are making it to be.
>
Difference of general vs specific (gnome) case?
> Miguel.
>
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]