Re: migrating to new backend format
- From: George Farris <george gmsys com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: migrating to new backend format
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:15:52 -0700
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 13:59, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:48:27PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:29, Chipzz wrote:
> > > but ~/.gconf26 is _UGLY_ ...
> >
> > Only way out of that is to avoid extending the format. None of the three
> > options get you out of it.
> >
> > We may be able to think of a nicer name than .gconf26.
>
> Keep the ~/.gconf but use different file names.
> Parallel install should still be doable, and trying to open the
> old resource might still be doable too,
>
> Daniel
Wouldn't freedesktop.org specify something like ~/.var/gconf or
~/.Settings/gconf. Are we not trying to move away from all the .dot
files in our home directories?
Shouldn't this be a part of gnome-2.6's direction?
--
George Farris <george gmsys com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]