RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - gok
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: bill haneman sun com
- Cc: peter korn sun com, jdub perkypants org, desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - gok
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:26:26 +0200
> From: Bill Haneman [mailto:bill haneman sun com]
> Actually GOK *does* use the GTK+ theme in all cases, but it
> adds its own
> GtkStyles (by default) for its custom buttons.
>
> It _does_ have good reason to do this since these buttons need to be
> visually distinguishable as to their function, and there aren't
> enough/appropriate STATES in GTK+.
Is this just to distinguish different _types_ of keys? e.g. alphanumeric
keys and modifier keys? Is there a good reason why all keys must be some
shade of blue?
> GOK is unusual in several ways, but it does need to be in
> order to meet
> the specialized needs of its users.
It would be interesting to hear more about this.
> I find that GOK is substantially
> less "nice" (and for that matter, less attractive IMO) if you make it
> use the GTK+ colors for its buttons.
If the "use GTK+ default theme/style" setting is really useless then maybe
it shouldn't be there.
> It uses the GTK+ font face but in some cases it must use a slightly
> smaller font for some button labels; that's simply a consequence of
> limited screen real estate for the "qwerty" keyboard. The alternative
> would be either to split that keyboard up, or to make it
> bigger than the
> screen, neither of which would be very nice for the user.
That sounds reasonable. Is there any solution for people who can't read the
tiny text?
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]