RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: aes gnome org
- Cc: bill haneman sun com, mpeseng tin it, sisob eircom net, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 08:44:39 +0200
> From: Andrew Sobala [mailto:aes gnome org]
> > So, "having an accessible browser" should not be one of the
> reasons for
> > having a GNOME-specific browser, given that this problem is
> being solved
> > elsewhere?
>
> Hey,
>
> If KDE improved their a11y support wouldn't mean that we would drop
> ours. If GNOME is committed to being accessible, then every component
> should be accessible. Just because mozilla is accessible
> doesn't give a
> GNOME browser an excuse not to be.
I didn't suggest that it would be. I just wanted confirmation that a11y was
not a reason to have a GNOME-specific browser.
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]