RE: 2.4 Module List - zenity

> From: ERDI Gergo [mailto:cactus cactus rulez org] 
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > If such things are actually useful for a lot of users then 
> they should be
> > part of the regular Nautilus functionality.
> But I thought it was a good idea to do the opposite -- move 
> features from
> a hardcoded core to scripts that interface with a smallish core.

You think that some of the current Nautilus functionality that's implemented
in C should actually be implemented in shell scripts? Do you have any
candidate functionality to start with?

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]