Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11) - Browser
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11) - Browser
- Date: 19 Mar 2003 15:16:47 +0100
Hello,
It would be nice to discuss the OpenH323 dependancy too as I don't think
it is more "onerous" than the whole mozilla dependancy. Including the
whole mozilla isn't worse than including OpenH323 imho, but I can be
wrong.
I would like to have at least a private discussion with one of you about
the inclusion of GnomeMeeting as collaboration software in the core
desktop.
Thanks,
Le mer 19/03/2003 à 13:47, Jeff Waugh a écrit :
> <quote who="Murray Cumming Comneon com">
>
> > What are the API-freeze/release dates for Mozilla's GRE module, which I
> > suppose Epiphany would use as a dependeny instead of the whole of Mozilla?
> > It needs to be compatible with the GNOME 2.4 schedule.
>
> We don't necessarily have to rely on GRE, but then we do have to discuss a
> whole mozilla dependency (which I don't believe is too onerous, but a lot of
> people do, and there are a few API issues in there that some might be
> worried about).
>
> - Jeff
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]