Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11) - Browser
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11) - Browser
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:06:17 +1100
<quote who="Murray Cumming Comneon com">
> > than simply depending on Mozilla at the GNOME Desktop release level
> > (which doesn't guarantee API stability anyway, which is why I don't
> > think that angle is very weighty).
>
> Good point. The premise of my question was wrong.
It is a problem that we will have to face though, so I think it's a very
valid argument for not introducing a mozilla dependency on a desktop module.
But my own opinion is that it's okay, and that we should. ;-)
- Jeff
--
"I can't imagine anyone telling Emma Bunton to shut up. It would be
rather like slapping Bambi."
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]