Re: Question about html widget.

On Saturday 15 March 2003 04:34, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
|  On 14Mar2003 03:28PM (-0500), Havoc Pennington wrote:
|  >  - clearly the only really viable engines for *web browsing*
|  >    (vs. limited lightweight use) are khtml and gecko.
|  >    gecko is being split out into a library that will be more
|  >    usable, khtml could be gtk-ported.
|  If you start with WebCore, half the porting work is already done for
|  you (no comments on relative merits of khtml vs. gecko).

Certanly, this would be quite interesting product/project.

I just hope that dependency tree would be only GTK2 (no GNOME2 dependencies), 
so that such browser can be used outside GNOME, with light WMs like IceWM, 
BlackBox, etc.

|  Regards,
|  Maciej
|  _______________________________________________
|  desktop-devel-list mailing list
|  desktop-devel-list gnome org

Best Regards,

Vadim Plessky
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]