Re: Galeon2 / Nautilus as a web browser [was: Re: KDE Interop [Was: D-BUS background]]



Le lun 10/03/2003 à 11:09, Vadim Plessky a écrit :
> On Monday 10 March 2003 01:28, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> |  On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:15:19PM -0800, Frank Worsley wrote:
> |  > I don't understand what problem people seem to be having with Galeon as
> |  > of late. I use it everyday from Debian unstable and it works great! It
> |  > also doesn't seem too complex or comlicated at all. The UI is nice and
> |  > simple, the preferences are kept to a minimum and it seems to follow the
> |  > Gnome HIG very closely. Oh, and the Nautilus view is awesome too ... if
> |  > people really want to use Nautilus as a web browser they should try it
> |  > with the Galeon view.
> |  >
> |  > So, what's the problem here? Am I missing something important?
> |
> |  I haven't actually tried recent Galeon 2, but my understanding was
> |  that it was Marco's effort that simplified it, and that the current
> |  Galeon 2 maintainers are planning to revert to a Galeon 1 style
> |  browser, while Marco is continuing Epiphany which is essentially
> |  Galeon 2 with the plan to stay simplified. i.e. Galeon 2 will continue
> |  in the simplified form under the name Epiphany, while the thing called
> |  Galeon will become more like old Galeon.
> 
> I just can tell here that I don't have time at a moment to compile those 
> releases, especially from CVS.
> So, I basically leave the task to the packager, which (in my case) Mandrake.
> 
> AFAIK, neither Galeon2 or Epiphany is part of upcoming Mandrake 9.1 release, 
> so for many Linux desktop users both would be unknown.

Really ??? You should have a look at Mandrake 9.1 RC2, they contains
galeon 1.3.2 ...

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandrakesoft com>
MandrakeSoft




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]