Re: Themes, Icons, Desktop Integration/Consistency, and The GNOME Architecture
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Themes, Icons, Desktop Integration/Consistency, and The GNOME Architecture
- Date: 07 Mar 2003 11:14:04 +0000
> Also, as far as consistency goes, the UI Prefs for deciding
> which toolbar style to use, and icon size in the toolbar, seem to have
> the ability to be set with XSettings,
Is this the same thing as the "gtk-icon-size" string in the RC file, or
different? I think we should surely have only one icon-sizing API.
I agree with dobey that the current situation is not great. I've been
fretting about gtk-stock-icons versus THemes versus desktop-icon-themes
for awhile. I do get nervous about suggestions that icon theming move
into gnome-vfs, but am too ignorant to explain exactly why :-)
One upon I time I thought I heard that gtk-stock-icons should
integrate/interop with the desktop-icon-set "spec" (which I guess is
still kind of immature?) I raised this a few weeks ago but nobody took
the bait. It seems to me that, if feasible, this is the kind of thing
we should aim for in GTK+-2.6 if it can't be done in time for GTK+-2.4
(but surely we don't want to wait for GNOME 2.8 to fix this!)
It seems to me that the gtk-stock-icon stuff should transparently work
with desktop-icon-sets. If we want desktop-icon-sets to somehow be
totally toolkit-agnostic then we need to use the same theming and
pixmap-naming-and-finding mechanisms across the board in GNOME, don't
we?
-Bill
--
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]