Re: Bug reporting [Was: Promoting greater integration between testers!:)]
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, fherrera onirica com, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bug reporting [Was: Promoting greater integration between testers!:)]
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 04:53:37 +1000
<quote who="Owen Taylor">
> Fromthe GTK+ bug perspective I hate the idea of one more
> step to deal with incoming bug reports ...
You can RESOLVE/WONTFIX an UNCONFIRMED bug, so it won't be an additional
step unless you begin to avoid looking through UNCONFIRMED bugs as part of
your developer-side process.
(Which is unlikely in your case, as triaging is very much a developer-side
process for GTK+, right? It's a more distributable process for GNOME's user
facing products.)
> GTK's bugzilla problem can't be dealt with triaging; since if a bug is
> closed immediately, it's quite frequently a RESOLVED/WONTFIX ... a
> rejected RFE and thus some sort policy decision.
What are the major GTK+ bugzilla problems?
- Jeff
--
Get Informed: SCO vs. IBM http://sco.iwethey.org/
Cette menace est très sérieuse.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]