Re: Consensus on a new background



Ok, but that's Thailand, not Nigeria. :-)

But in any case, I still disagree that this precludes us from showing a
footish logo. An image of a real or realistic foot, perhaps. But the
footish gnome logo, imho, is not something any right-minded person would
consider offensive.

Cheers,
Loban

On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 12:03, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Am Die, 2003-06-10 um 12.28 schrieb Loban A Rahman:
> > > Nigeria is one of the countries where the foot shouldn't be shown
> > > (AFAIK), but what should we use? Actually the foot *is* our logo ...
> > > in my eyes the foot should be treated as a logo in the first place ...
> > 
> > What? In my 12 years of living there, I have never heard this.
> > 
>  Hi loban,
> sorry for my late reply, but i was in the woods for a couple of days.
> well, i just googled and found this page (
> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7789/index7.html )
> 
> xcuse me if it was wrong :)
> 
> - fabiand
-- 
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
|   Loban Amaan Rahman  <-- anagram of -->  Aha! An Abnormal Man!   |
| loban earthling net, loban caltech edu,  http://loban.caltech.edu |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]