Re: Visual regression with gnome-panel 2.3.x

[Mark Finlay <sisob eircom net>]

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 18:11, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Mark Finlay">
> 
> > I'm not sure If I'm the only one that's seening this, but the default
> > panel setup with 2.3.x is not half as nice looking as 2.2.x - It's very
> > possible that this is going to be addressed anyway before 2.4, but I just
> > want to make sure.
> 
> Not entirely surprising, given the awesome and massive refactoring Mark
> McLoughlin has done.

Yeah, and I comment him for it. Don't want to sound like I'm giving out,
just want to make sure that these are bugs not design decisions.

> > The panels are way too high for my linking. 24px for 16px launchers seems
> > a bit OTT for me. But If I make the panels any smaller, launchers and the
> > notification area are absolutley tiny. What is there so much vertical
> > padding on the new panels?
> 
> Screenshot? My panel icons look okeydokey here.

There's a screenshot at http://xsu.sf.net/panel-spacing.gif . 
It's animated, the redhat panel is 2.2 and the other one is 2.3

In 2.2 with my panel set at X small the launchers are pretty much
flush against the edge of the panel, but in 2.3 there is loads of 
spacing around them and they're absolutley tiny.

-- 
Mark Finlay <sisob eircom net>