Re: gucharmap
- From: Noah Levitt <nlevitt columbia edu>
- To: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, The Release Groove <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gucharmap
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:43:15 -0500
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:29:04 +0000, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> I think the first thing that you should try to do is to try and get it
> included into the 5th toe release, which is expected sometime after we
> release 2.2.
Ok. What does this mean, and how do I do it? :)
>
> I'm not entirely convinced that the UI is right for the average user
> right now - it may be worth mailing usability gnome org for ideas of how
> to clean it up. It would be good to take a complete set of screenshots
> for them to look at [including menu entries, dialogs, etc..]. Obviously
> I'm basing these comments off 0.1 - I see 0.2 is much improved ;)
On irc about a month ago, Seth "peed" (his word) on 0.1, and
suggested a bunch of stuff. 0.2 basically incorporates his
suggestions.
I'll put some screenshots together and send a link to the
usability list anyway.
>
> We also need to think about any accessibility requirements - the use of
> a GtkDrawingArea might present some problems to overcome.
Definitely, but I don't know what should be done with this.
Suggestions on how to proceed?
>
> Other than the above comments, I'd definitely like to see it getting
> scheduled for inclusion in 2.4. I'm also thinking that it would be good
> to increase the version number a little - is it really only 0.2?
Well, it's only about 2 months old and hasn't been stress
tested or code reviewed or anything, so I think it still
deserves a humble version number. But maybe the next version
after 0.2 can be 1.0.
Noah
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]