Christ (the self evidence of this patent even makes me religious, my apologies for the non christians -- and those as well)! As I read the claims, I almost thought I was reading the following document: http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Patents/anatomy-trivial-patent.txt This seems like another example of a trivial patent. Rui On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 17:01, Lars Weber wrote: > Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote: > > However, looking at the Apple latest patent [1], it is clear that the > > patch would make Nautilus violates claim 1 of that patent. > > Your URL didn't work for me, so here is one that does: > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,307,545.WKU.&OS=PN/6,307,545&RS=PN/6,307,545 > > Regards, > Lars > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part