Re: [g-a-devel]Proposed implementation agnostic GNOME Speech API.
- From: Scott Berry <n7zib bresnan net>
- To: Rich Burridge <Rich Burridge Sun COM>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]Proposed implementation agnostic GNOME Speech API.
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:56:37 -0700 (MST)
I also have a question here. Why is it that Gnopernicus uses such a
complicated layer of keys. Being new to the program it makes it quite
difficult to use. I wonder if this could be changed?
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003,
Rich Burridge wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Marc Mulcahy asked my to announce something I've been working on
> over the last few weeks, and get feedback from the community on.
>
> I've filed bug #129205
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129205
>
> to capture this work.
>
> In short, I've created an implementation agnostic set of wrappers for
> the existing GNOME Speech v0.2.X API that used GObject. It hides the
> existing Bonobo/ORBit2 implementation under the covers.
>
> There is a test application included in one of the two attachments
> to the bug.
>
> If accepted, it's planned that the Bonobo/ORBit2 API would continue
> to be provided (but deprecated).
>
> I've also rewritten the speech related code in gnopernicus to use
> this new API, but I haven't attached that work yet, until the
> community feel that this is a good thing to do.
>
> I know the API/ABI freeze for GNOME 2.5/6 has already happened, so
> this is something we'd like to consider for GNOME 2.7/8.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]