Re: gnome-netstatus 0.12



On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 16:32, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 15:24, Chipzz wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
> > > Subject: Re: gnome-netstatus 0.12
> > >
> > > Hey there,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:10, Hasbullah Bin Pit wrote:
> > > > Mark McLoughlin menulis:
> > >
> > > > > 	It probably doesn't make sense to have this as a separate package so I
> > > > > would imagine it makes sense in gnome-network if that goes into 2.6 or,
> > > > > failing that, gnome-applets.
> > > >
> > > > errr gnome-applet?
> > >
> > > 	Sorry ? I'm saying that the applet probably belongs in either
> > > gnome-network or gnome-applets depending on the new modules decision for
> > > 2.6.
> > 
> > I'ld like to make a vote to put it in gnome-applets regardless of wether
> > gnome-network gets in or not. This looks like an applet with pretty much
> > standard functionality, and you may not want to install gnome-network
> > just for this applet (if you don't need the rest of gnome-network).
> 
> 	Well, I'm kind of of the opinion that we should split gnome-applets up
> and this applet should go into one of those groups ... but I'm not sure
> whether its worth the work.
> 
> 	But sure, I tend to agree with you. I'm still concerned that
> gnome-network seems like a pretty arbitrary grouping of utilities[1] and
> that it should be split up. People didn't seem to agree with me the last
> time I suggested that,
>
I personally agreed, although I hadn't had the chance to have time to
work on it. But really, I've got nothing against splitting it up in
different CVS modules.

cheers




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]