Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.1 Development Release
- From: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.1 Development Release
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:34:37 -0500
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 12:16, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 09:32, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Owen, are we going to get a gtk 2.3.1 release out for this? I'd really
> > like to get the xd-unstable users something a bit more robust than 2.3.1
> > and begin to get a better grasp on the quality of the current 2.3 stuff.
>
> I'll spend whatever time I need this weekend to get 2.3.1 done.
Great! thanks.
> Of course, that won't give you something *more* robust than 2.3.1 :-)
Doh. Of course, I meant 2.3.0- HEAD definitely has some fixes that have
at least made nautilus more stable than it was against 2.3.0.
> I don't think there have been a whole lot of changes since 2.3.0 (well
> 900 lines of ChangeLog, but not *that* much...) so if you have
> particular robustness concerns, it would be good to know about them.
The nautilus ones are fixed, AFAICT. Evo against HEAD still seems to
trigger some weirdness- I'll start filing those more religiously.
Luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]