Re: KDE and Gnome
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: KDE and Gnome
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:11:26 -0400
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 09:23, Julien Olivier wrote:
> > You are so over-simplifying it's not even funny. What happens when
> > toolkits move to Cairo for rendering?
> > What happens when toolkits want
> > to accelerate rendering beyond blitting some pre-made cheesy pixmap?
> > Most theme engines do a lot of very customized drawing with no pixmaps
> > in sight, and that's a good thing.
> >
>
> If some toolkits don't want to use bitmap widgets, that's a problem.
> This solution would of course only work for _bitmap_ themes, which are
> managed by both QT and GTK currently. Another solution would be to use
> SVG themes only but, of course, that would have a negative impact on
> performance.
A huge number of themes don't use bitmaps. A good number of the popular
ones these days use almost none, if any. Bitmaps aren't a solution -
that's why there _are_ different engine backends in GTK, and not just a
single built-in pixmap based engine. If you're theme library can only
handle pixmaps, it's not worth the effort, imo.
And that's only talking about Qt/GTK.
--
Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]