Re: lock down features

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:17:50PM +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: 
> Thus, this "lock down' should be taken as a preventive method for
> accidental changes that should not be promoted.
> Or am I missing something?

I think you're right that it isn't genuinely secure, yes.
But I don't know if that's a requirement, at least for an initially
useful feature.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]