Re: Default WM theme settings

[David Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>]

Given the fact that nearly all screenshots would have to be dumped if a
new theme was used, it would probably be best to just stick with crux.

dave

On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 17:57, John Fleck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:35:12AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Jens Knutson">
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 13:27, Michael Toomim wrote:
> > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the major UI-change decisions in 
> > > > gnome supposed to happen with 2.2 instead of 2.0?  It might be good to 
> > > > make this choice along with the rest of the desktop's UI, since there 
> > > > will no doubt be consistency issues.
> > > 
> > > That may have been the intention back last year, but I don't think this
> > > is playing out now - there *are* a lot of UI changes going on,
> > > especially regarding usability and HIG compliance.  I think this issue
> > > of the default WM theme definitely falls under those headings...
> > 
> > The main issue behind the UI freeze is documentation. The docs dudes have
> > already started taking screenshots of GNOME windows decoradted with Crux, so
> > if there was any change, someone would have to offer their time to go
> > through and re-take all of those screenshots.
> > 
> 
> And when I last brought the issue up several months ago, the
> discussion rather petered out, and we ended up settled on Crux, and
> a team of enslaved house elves in Outer Mongolia is now in the midst
> of manufacturing screenshots galore. A change at this point would make
> the house elves most distraught, as they don't get paid.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> John
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list