Re: the fate of control-center-plus

[Richard Hestilow <hestilow ximian com>]

The overall consensus appears to be that one should use metatheme
instead.

On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 18:40, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On 21Jan2002 03:49PM (-0600), Richard Hestilow wrote:
> > So, there are so few capplets left nowadays in control-center-plus that
> > I am very tempted to re-merge the modules. The old rationale was partly
> > that they were all crap capplets that were a bitch to maintain, but now
> > that theme-switcher and file-types are rewritten I don't think that's
> > too much of a reason any more. They should stay in "Advanced" but I
> > think dependency-wise it's easier to move the three capplets (and the
> > assorted "desktop-links" for sawfish, etc) back into g-c-c proper. I
> > would be willing to do the non-cvs surgery part of the merging work, but
> > I would need someone with the proper rights to do the surgery itself.
> 
> Why is theme switching considered "advanced"? Customizing appearance
> is one of the most basic user preferences there is, isn't it?
> 
>  - Maciej
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list