Re: profterm's eel usage ...
- From: Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>
- Subject: Re: profterm's eel usage ...
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:21:24 +0000 (GMT)
On 24 Feb 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:
[snip]
> This ensures that we avoid the "dumping ground effect" that's been so
> painful in other libraries. It also avoids maintenance-by-committee
> since each piece of the staging lib has a clear owner - the maintainer
> of the library that it makes sense for the feature to end up in.
>
> So in essence the staging lib is a shared tool for maintainers of
> platform libraries.
>
> Another rule has to be that only platform libs can be dependencies of
> the staging lib, probably. Since everything in the staging lib is
> targetted for one of the platform libs.
>
I'd ditch the probably - unless we are going to add that new dependency X
as part of the platform the code shouldn't depend on it, as it will need
to stop doing it at the moment it is moved into the main library anyways.
> And a ground guideline has to be that we are really serious about "no
> compat guarantees" - if something turns out to be wrong, then it comes
> out or gets changed, and people have to fix their apps.
>
The "being really serious about no compat guarantees" only works if the
maintainers are really serious about "will include in the library",
because otherwise you are back at gal...
>
> Havoc
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]