Re: battstat suspend patches
- From: Gediminas Paulauskas <menesis delfi lt>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: Kevin Vandersloot <kfv101 psu edu>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Anders Carlsson <andersca codefactory se>
- Subject: Re: battstat suspend patches
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:28:19 +0200
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 14:46, Kevin Vandersloot wrote:
Bad Bastien! Use GtkDialog ;) GnomeDialogs are deprecated.
Why o why would one want to depracated something like that. To get
everybody to write their own helper functions ?
If your really want to write some helper functions, you better wouldn't
write them so broken as GnomeDialog was.
Afaics gnome-dialog hasn't been "ported", ie. it doesn't use GtkDialog.
If I port it (or at least the gnome-dialog-utils that I find very
useful), would that be ok to un-deprecate it ?
Yes, GnomeDialog derives from GtkWindow rather than GtkDialog. Just because
they are completely differrent. At least w.r.t. buttons adding and handling.
If you like gnome-dialog-util, or gnome-message-box, just use
gtkmessagedialog -- it replaces lots of functions in original gnome files
with just a few new ones, but provide almost the same functionality (except
request_string type dialogs).
It even format strings for you:
gtk_message_dialog_new (parent, flags, type, buttons,
"Could not open file %s: %s", filename, error);
Of course you could write helper functions, but it would save you just a
couple of lines (i.e. instead of flags, type and buttons just provide
functions with different name for each set of those parameters). Not worth.
--
Gediminas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]