Minutes for Gnome 2 release team meeting 2002-08-21
- From: hobbit aloss ukuu org uk
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, release-team gnome org
- Subject: Minutes for Gnome 2 release team meeting 2002-08-21
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:29:36 +0100
* Note that last week's minutes had the right date in the message
body, but the wrong date in the subject line. Dear me. These have
the right one. I hope.
Minutes for Gnome 2 release team meeting 2002-08-21
===================================================
Present: full house! (Bingo!)
Frederic Crozat
Glynn Foster
Karl Gaffney
Jody Goldberg
Telsa Gwynne
Mikael Hallendal
Luis Villa
Jeff Waugh
Actions
-------
DONE: Telsa to start pulling together lists of what we are missing and
poking people to provide the info.
DONE: Jeff to find GNOME hackers that have terminal test suites (for
testing of vte and libzvt-i18n)
=> vttest is it. http://dickey.his.com/vttest/vttest.html
We just need to start getting people to use it now :)
DONE: Luis to update known issues for 2.0.1
DONE: Luis to provide links to bugfixes.
PENDING: Frederic to write GEP for release-consistent version numbering
changes, due week after next (he's on vacation)
=> Back off vacation, hasn't forgotten about it.
PENDING: Sort out list of new stuff expected in 2.2.
=> Jeff to send request for this out, and we will split the
results up among us by package and each monitor one small group.
NEW: Karl to check dotplan and see what needs changing.
NEW: Telsa to stuff her list of "missing" into bugzilla and
solicit contributions.
NEW: Telsa to check list of mailing lists and ensure someone from
release team is present on each of the projects who don't have
specific members on the release-team.
NEW: Karl to make noises in next few weeks about performance
and profiling. He said "three weeks", so remember for second
meeting in September.
NEW: Mikael to send first API update to Jeff.
NEW: Luis to send bug summary to Jeff
NEW: Jeff to consolidate the above two and the You are here and
send out. These three actions should become a routine so probably
won't appear in the minutes again.
NEW: Jeff to check in changes to dotplan.
NEW: Jeff to install analog or webalyser on the box hosting dotplan
so we know what people are looking for/at/over.
NEW: Jeff to create check-list of "things to do before major
release" and maintain it so it's ready for 2.2.0.
NEW: Luis to draft list of what we might want to add to desktop
for 2.2.
NEW: Luis to draft standards of what we expect for a finished
app that's going into 2.2 then post to g-h and d-d-l for discussion.
Decisions and discussions
-------------------------
* Communication
Just discovered that with the change in release team membership,
we're not on all the relevant mailing lists. No-one on accessibilty
lists for example. Bad release team, bad! Glynn, Jody and Luis to
head over to that list. Telsa to check for more lists we forgot.
* Performance
The speed-up in Nautilus between Gnome 1.x and 2.0 was very noticeable,
due to improvements in both Nautilus and the underlying libraries.
We think we should encourage this kind of thing for 2.2.x as much
as possible. Would a Sun box for people with no access to it help?
Perhaps, although running X apps remotely can be a bit painful.
Those companies who have access to profiling tools we don't have
floating around Gnome already should be encouraged to bugzilla
results of them: it all helps.
* Planning ahead.
We need a check-list for the next major release which we should
make now, because we didn't really have a formal one for 2.0.0.
Make it whilst we remember. Things like "have the mirrors been
told of the definite final date" etc.
* How long will Gnome 2.0.x continue?
If Gnome 2.2.0 is a howling success, likely that Gnome 2.0.x will
stop releasing shortly after as people move to hacking on 2.2.x
and little occurs on 2.0.x. If Gnome 2.2.0 is buggy, then 2.0.x
will probably end up continuing longer.
[Note: when I sent the minutes to release-team for agreement, this
was clarified to "we don't anticipate 2.0.x to continue past 2.0.3".
This is not what I understood at the meeting, but that's why you
get them checked first :)]
* Weekly updates
As well as the weekly "You are here"s, we shall start weekly updates
on other areas. API documentation is something we want to improve,
so Mikael will list additions there. Luis will summarise bugs in
that too. The "You are here"s will be incorporated into it. That
way it's all in one mail. Luis thinks that when we release 2.0.x,
we must send info about 2.0.x+1 out so immediately that we should
look at sending it out _with_ 2.0.x. But if the weekly "you are
here"s are successful, he agrees this can be dropped.
* Dotplan
Jeff is hoping to check in changes to dotplan (widget, the web box,
is currently having issues.) He will also install webaliser or analog
on there to find out what pages people are looking at and for. A
quick grep of the logs by hand revealed Malcolm Tredinnick's Gnome 2
porting guide as the most popular dotplan offering. Congratulations
to Malcolm.
* Developer platform/Desktop/Fifth Toe.
Carlos (chbm on IRC) says Balsa is ported to Gnome 2: where does it
fit? (Yay, first Gnome 2 mailer to port.) Led to discussion on
the lines to draw. Summary:
- we don't anticipate adding anything to development platform.
- it's possible we may want to add to desktop.
- desktop is "what you expect on a desktop".
- different people expect different things...
- fifth toe is "the fun stuff that isn't desktop".
- line between the last pair is fine.
- Balsa, rhythmbox, googliser are all now ported to Gnome 2.
They have not necessarily gone through the stability testing
(aka, betas and release candidates) and "how well does it conform
to HIG?" process.
Glynn and Kevin V are going to write a GEP for gnome-applets
and gnome-utils anyway.
Luis will come up with a list of what we think we want to add to the
desktop for 2.2.
Luis also will write up suggested standards about "what we expect
for a final finished product" Then post to g-h and d-d-l for
discussion.
* 2.1 snapshots and version numbering.
Re Frederic's action item: we should think about version numbering now
for this.
* FTP site
Jeff sent out suggestions for ftp site revamp. got two responses
saying "this would be cool". Now what?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2002-August/msg00069.html
Telsa
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]