On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 20:31, ERDI Gergo wrote: > Hi, > > While reading the Sun security report (which is great to have, btw), I had > this idea of a low-tech, localized (i.e. it doesn't require rewriting code > in lots of places) solution, which is to modify GConf to support > memory-only keys. That is, a special schema flag would make GConf not save > a key's value to disk. So when you use the first app that wants your HTTP > proxy password (or any other password), you type it in, the app sets the > GConf key, and gconfd remembers it so other apps can access it -- but only > until you log out. > > Does this make any sense? This sounds great, but you would really want the ability to save them to disk encrypted as well... ~/.gconf_private anyone ? ;) -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part