Re: Bug#4256: The gpilotd daemon shuts down unexpectedly
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: Johan Walles <d92-jwa nada kth se>
- cc: calendar-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bug#4256: The gpilotd daemon shuts down unexpectedly
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 17:07:08 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Eskil Heyn Olsen wrote:
> It just went down. The event had an alarm at 1900, and I had left gnomecal
> running. As gnomecal popped up the alarm box, gpilotd exited with SIGALRM.
Geh... I think I've found the problem. Creating a calendar also intializes
its alarms. Thus setitimer(...) is called for all entries with alarms, but
no handlers for the signal is set up.
So I either set up a handler, or more properly, I create the calendar
without setting up the alarms.
For the gnomecal people:
The problem is that calendar.c:calendar_new calls calendar_init_alarms,
thereby causing SIGALRMs to be sent to gpilotd.
Since pilot-link uses alarm for some watchdog thing (though I'm not sure
it's used normally), I'll add a calendar_new_without_alarms, which
contains the code of calendar_new execpt the init_alarms. To remove code
duping, I'll let calendar_new call calendar_new_without_alarms and then
the init.
I'd prefer let calendar_new do the alarmless init and then
calendar_new_with_alarm, but then I'd have to make a lot of changes around
gnomecal.
On the other hand, some places calendar_new is used to create a temporary
calendar, surely having these setup more setitimer calls is unessecary.
Opinions or the usual silence ? (in which case I'll go ahead and do The
Right Thing).
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]