On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:40:08PM +0000, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> On 02/26/2005 05:50:13 AM, Pawel Salek wrote:
> [ snip ]
> >Would it be OK to replace the code there with:
> >
> > else {
> > if(!message)
> > message =
> >libbalsa_mailbox_get_message(mailbox,msgno);
> > str =
> >internet_address_list_to_string(message->headers->
>
> Committed to HEAD (with some other minor reorganization).
This will probably be uploaded into Debian unstable within the next 24
hours.
balsa (2.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Correct bugs in filters code.
+ [debian/patches/00_filters.patch]
CVS: libbalsa/mailbox_local.c (r1.132)
* [debian/README.Debian]:
- Provide new URL for Albrecht Dreß's "Secure Mail with Balsa" HOWTO
* [debian/rules]:
- Deflate dependencies via ld's --as-needed option.
Thanks: Jeff Waugh <jdub gnome org>
-- Andrew Lau <netsnipe users sourceforge net> Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:36:14 +1100
Are there any other show stopping bugs that warrant blocking balsa 2.3.0
from replacing 2.2.6 in testing? Is Albrecht's destroyed mbox incident
enough cause, or should we sit tight for the next 10 days until more
details/cases surface?
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & Computer Science, UNSW
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature