Re: Testing . bug with different mailer



On 2003.01.29 14:43 Laurent Duperval wrote:
> On 2003.01.29 08:38 laurent.duperval@microcell.ca wrote:
>> Sooooo let's see, does Bar make it through:
>> 
>> Foo
>> 
> 
> Ok, so it's a MTA problem. Maybe I should post a bug report for that 
> mailer. Anyone know what MTA is used at gnome.org? (I'm assuming 
> that's where balsa-list is hosted).

This is not a problem with gnome.org's MTA. My message	 
<20030129131443.GK14289@pi.biotech.kth.se> containing single dot got 
through without damage. The problem, IMO, is in one of the servers 
below:

Received: from gatekeeper.microcell.ca (gatekeeper.microcell.ca 
[205.151.8.2])
Received: from mailserv.microcell.ca (mailserv.microcell.ca [10.2.0.87])
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Received: from smtlpexc05.microcell.ca (SMTLPEXC05.microcell.ca 
[10.2.7.205])
Received: from kiskeya.microcell.ca (10.7.28.32 [10.7.28.32])

/pawel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]