Re: content-disposition attach / inline

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On 2002.02.20 16:19:35 +0000 Pawel Salek wrote:
> On 2002.02.20 17:14 Carlos Morgado wrote:
>> 
>> anyone has strong feelings about content-disposition ? should we use it ?
>> should we default to inline ?
>> 
>> if noone replies i'll just disable that header and revert to old behaviour
> 
> Obviously, the actual message body should never have content-disposition 
> set to ATTACH, should it?
> 
err, of course :) i meant always use disposition: inline and let the
other side deal with it if it can't display it, as oposed to specifying
attach for non text/ types

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds