Re: HTML document "attachment" icon

[Toralf Lund <toralf kscanners com>]

On 2001.09.07 11:11 Toralf Lund wrote:
> > On Fri,  7 September 01:27 hitched97@myrealbox.com wrote:
> > 
> > >At 09:13 AM 9/6/01, Brian Stafford wrote:
> > >>If a message has a text/html part marked as an attachment, then
> that's
> > >>what it is.
[ ... ]

> Seems complicated to me, but I don't know libmutt, either.
> 
> Perhaps we could leave it at searching for "Content-Disposition:
> attachment" for the paperclip icon. If we want an indication about the
> content, why not simply want to add an icon if there is *nothing* in the
> message that can be viewed directly - based on MIME types? 
I guess we want to consult the content-disposition headers when traversing
the tree, though, and leave out branches that are marked as attachments
(question: What if multipart content is marked as attachment, and one or
more of the parts as inline?)

- Toralf