Re: [PATCH] : More cleanups/improvments
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
- To: Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] : More cleanups/improvments
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:37:02 +0200
On 2001.10.15 17:52 Emmanuel wrote:
> diff -u balsa-1.2.0/libbalsa/address-book-ldif.c
> test/balsa-1.2.0/libbalsa/address-book-ldif.c
> --- balsa-1.2.0/libbalsa/address-book-ldif.c Sat Aug 25 01:22:41
> 2001
> +++ test/balsa-1.2.0/libbalsa/address-book-ldif.c Mon Oct 15
> 16:29:33 2001
> @@ -637,8 +631,7 @@
> gtk_object_ref(GTK_OBJECT(addr1));
> resa = g_list_next(resa);
> resb = g_list_next(resb);
> - } else if (resa != NULL &&
> - (resb == NULL || address_compare(addr1, addr2) > 0) )
> {
> + } else if (address_compare(addr1, addr2) > 0) {
> res = g_list_prepend(res, addr1);
> gtk_object_ref(GTK_OBJECT(addr1));
> resa = g_list_next(resa);
I think this is wrong: what if one of resa or resb is NULL?
address_compare will get a null pointer on input, and that would be an
error.
Also, I have not quite understood the point of
mutt_mktemp->libbalsa_mktemp transition?
/Pawel
--
Pawel Salek, Theoretical Chemistry, SCFAB, Stockholm
http://www.theochem.kth.se/~pawsa/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]