Re: SEGV when replying to mail.



On 2001.08.26 23:17:41 +0100 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 07:28:51PM +0200, M . Thielker wrote:
> 
> >  
> > @@ -249,7 +248,10 @@
> >      body->encoding = encoding_style;
> >      body->parameter = mutt_new_parameter();
> >      body->parameter->attribute = g_strdup("charset");
> > +	if (charset)
> >      body->parameter->value = g_strdup(charset);
> > +	else
> > +		body->parameter->value = g_strdup("us-ascii");
> >      body->parameter->next = NULL;
> >  
> 
> reasonable. but why keep "us-ascii" as default ? i like iso-8859-1
> much better ;)
> peeve ;)

On the one hand, us-ascii is a good choice because the RFC 821/822 legacy
makes e-mail a 7 bit medium.

On the other hand, since MIME encoding support is in place, the actual default
should be an application preference.

Brian




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]