Re: Patch: Don't add attachment icon quite as often

[Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>]

On Wed, 22 August 13:38 Toralf Lund wrote:

> The patch introduces the distinction between a multipart message and a
> "message with attachments", which I think is important to keep. It is
> obvious that "multipart" does not mean the same as "having attachments",
> since there is something called "multipart/alternative"

Whether a message is considered to have attachments is determined by the
Content-Disposition: MIME header described in RFC 2183 and should not be
inferred from the MIME type.

Brian Stafford