Re: libglade and mailbox structure - opition requested

On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:37:17 Pawel Salek wrote:
> On 2000-06-21 19:21 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> > How deep would this go into the mailbox structs and definitions ? libmutt
> ?
> I hope it won't be necessary. I am certain the MailboxNode stuff will be
> extended and possibly slightly rewritten.
> > BTW, looks like my proposal for a new corba interface didn't reach the
> list. 
> It did reach me - but my knowledge about IDL is next to null so I didn't
> dare comment it. Having possibility to communicate with a pilot would be
> great, one more reason to stick with balsa :-).

well, problem is, my IDL clue level is "reading the basic docs" :) i was 
hopping someone a bit more clued would look at it. right now i just wan't
comments on the interface itself, not "gob won't read that" :)

[imap stuff removed - ENOCLUE:)]

Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]