Quoting Damien Sandras (dsandras seconix com): > please keep cool... please... I am, I just don't like being treated as a 2 year old when someone doesn't understand that what i'm writing about is not directly a bug-report but an inquiry to wether there might be someone who knows more about the problem described. (GnomeMeeting Crashing, removed ~/.gnome/gnomemeeting, GnomeMeeting works). > The right thing to do would be to not report debian bugs here, > but instead ask to the person to contact the mailing list so that we > can debug further. That's not how it works with Debian, i'm sorry to say. People file bugs on the _package_, these bugreports are delivered in _my_ mailbox, and the reporters don't care much about where it should go, they care about it being solved, but leave that to others. > Now, stop to be unpolite, please and to affirm that there is a > well-known problem of gnomemeeting when there is not. I'm unpolite to people who treat me like a 2 year old. To people who don't read what I write. And furthermore, about the assert failure, I have had more of these reports on gnomemeeting, too bad the Debian BTS keeps 'solved' bugs for 28 days and then purges them. And each time removing ~/.gnome/gnomemeeting solved the problem. But never mind, I don't have the material to show you what I mean, and you guys just say the problem doesn't exist. So this is where this thread stops. Regards, Sander. -- | De eerste serieuze ISP die Windows draait moeten we nog tegen komen | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
Attachment:
pgpWQKecTVTLJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature